Chapter 11: State Responsibility and State Claims
ILC Draft articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts
http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_6_2001.pdf
*Pages 444 – 446
On attribution of responsibility for failure to prevent genocide, see ICJ Judgment of 27 February 2007 in Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro)
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&code=bhy&case=91&k=f4
Footnote link:
6 http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf
55 Settlement of claims
Libyan admission of responsibility and proposals for settlement of claims in respect of the destruction of a Pan Am aircraft over Lockerbie in Scotland are in a letter to the President of the UN Security Council. This is rather different from the usual manner of negotiation leading to settlement of claims
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/scotland/3155825.stm
and see generally:
US Foreign Claims Settlement Commission
http://www.usdoj.gov/fcsc/
Chapter 12: International Courts and Tribunals
See generally Project on International Courts and Tribunals:
http://www.pict-pcti.org
An introduction to the ICJ is at:
http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?p1=1
Footnote links:
6 www.icj-cij.org
14 http://www.pca-cpa.org/
16 http://www.pca-cpa.org/
*19 For problems in selecting among arbitral possibilities, see
Occidental Exploration & Production Company v Republic of Ecuador
(UK, Court of Appeal)
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1116.html
23 http://arbiter.wipo.int/center/index.html
24 http://www.wto.org
26 http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/disp2_e.htm
33 http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/ORGANIZATION/BODEXT/0,,contentMDK:20122597~menuPK:64020034~pagePK:64020054~piPK:64020408~theSitePK:278036,00.html
54 http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/index.php?p1=5&p2=1&p3=4
On the USA’s withdrawal from the Vienna Consular Convention’s Optional Protocol Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes, see:
http://www.asil.org/insights/2005/03/insights050309.html
and addendum:
http://www.asil.org/insights/2005/03/insights050309a.html
On the View taken by the US Supreme Court of the ICJ judgments on the Vienna Consular Convention, see Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon 548 US
(28 June 2006)
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-10566.pdf
55 http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/index.php?p1=5&p2=1&p3=3
58 Provisional measures: see also Avena and Other Mexican Nationals (Mexico v. United States of America) (ICJ)
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&code=mus&case=128&k=18